Abstract
Background Little is known about the use of rehabilitation in the acute care setting and its impact on hospital readmissions.
Objective The objective of this study was to examine the association between the intensity of rehabilitation services received during the acute care stay for stroke and the risk of 30-day and 90-day hospital readmission.
Design A retrospective cohort analysis of all acute care hospitals in Arkansas and Florida was conducted.
Methods Patients (N=64,065) who were admitted for an incident stroke in 2009 or 2010 were included. Rehabilitation intensity was categorized as none, low, medium-low, medium-high, or high based on the sum and distribution of physical therapy, occupational therapy, and speech therapy charges within each hospital. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate hazard ratios, controlling for demographic characteristics, illness severity, comorbidities, hospital variables, and state.
Results Relative to participants who received the lowest intensity therapy, those who received higher-intensity therapy had a decreased risk of 30-day readmission. The risk was lowest for the highest-intensity group (hazard ratio=0.86; 95% confidence interval=0.79, 0.93). Individuals who received no therapy were at an increased risk of hospital readmission relative to those who received low-intensity therapy (hazard ratio=1.30; 95% confidence interval=1.22, 1.40). The findings were similar, but with smaller effects, for 90-day readmission. Furthermore, patients who received higher-intensity therapy had more comorbidities and greater illness severity relative to those who received lower-intensity therapy.
Limitations The results of the study are limited in scope and generalizability. Also, the study may not have adequately accounted for all potentially important covariates.
Conclusions Receipt of and intensity of rehabilitation therapy in the acute care of stroke is associated with a decreased risk of hospital readmission.
Footnotes
Dr Andrews and Dr Freburger provided concept/idea/research design, writing, and project management. Ms Li provided data collection. Dr Freburger and Ms Li provided data analysis. Dr Andrews provided fund procurement, participants, facilities/equipment, and administrative support. The authors thank Lily Wang at the Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, for her help with the statistical analyses.
This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Elon University.
This study was funded by Elon University Faculty Research and Development Fund.
- Received January 20, 2015.
- Accepted June 11, 2015.
