Skip to main content

  • Main menu
  • User menu
  • Search

Main menu

  • Home
  • Information for Publishers
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Ahead of Print
    • Subject Collections
    • Special Collection
  • News
  • Blog
  • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • About Us
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Information for Authors
    • Privacy Policy
  • DEMO
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Other Publications
    • HighWire Press, Inc.
    • New Journal 3
    • New Journal 2

User menu

  • My Cart
  • My alerts
  • Subscribe
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Demo Physical Therapy Journal
  • Other Publications
    • HighWire Press, Inc.
    • New Journal 3
    • New Journal 2
  • My Cart
  • My alerts
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
Demo Physical Therapy Journal

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Information for Publishers
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Ahead of Print
    • Subject Collections
    • Special Collection
  • News
  • Blog
  • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • About Us
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Information for Authors
    • Privacy Policy
  • DEMO
    • Submit a Manuscript
  • Follow hwdptj on Twitter
  • Visit hwdptj on Facebook
  • Follow hwdptj on LinkedIn
Research ArticleResearch Reports

Validity and Reliability of Two Abbreviated Versions of the Gross Motor Function Measure

Laura K. Brunton and Doreen J. Bartlett
Demo Journal of Physical Therapy April 2011, 91 (4) 577-588; DOI: https://doi.org/10.demo/ptj.20100279
Add to Cart ($36)
Laura K. Brunton
L.K. Brunton, MSc, BKin, is a PhD student in the Health and Rehabilitation Sciences Program, Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Western Ontario, 1011c Elborn College, 1201 Western Rd, London, Ontario, Canada N6G 1H1.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Doreen J. Bartlett
D.J. Bartlett, PT, PhD, is Associate Professor, School of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Western Ontario.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background The “gold standard” for measuring gross motor function in children with cerebral palsy is the 66-item Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM-66).

Objective The purpose of this study was to estimate the validity and reliability of 2 abbreviated versions of the GMFM-66; one version involves an item set approach, and the other version involves a basal and ceiling approach.

Design This was a measurement study comprising concurrent validity, comparability, and test-retest reliability components.

Methods The study participants were 26 children who were 2 to 6 years of age and had cerebral palsy across all Gross Motor Function Classification System levels. In the first session, both abbreviated versions were administered by 2 independent raters; next, the full GMFM-66 was administered. In the second session, only the abbreviated versions were administered by the same raters. Concurrent validity, comparability of versions, and test-retest reliability were determined with intraclass correlation coefficients [ICC (2,1)].

Results Both versions demonstrated high levels of validity, with an ICC of .99 (95% confidence interval=0.972–0.997), reflecting associations with the GMFM-66. Both versions also were shown to be highly reliable, with ICCs of greater than .98 (95% confidence interval=0.965–0.994).

Limitations A smaller-than-expected sample was recruited for this study and may be a potential limitation of the study.

Conclusion Both versions of the GMFM-66 can be used in clinical practice or research. However, the GMFM-66 with the basal and ceiling approach is recommended as the preferred abbreviated version.

Footnotes

  • Dr Bartlett provided concept/idea/research design, project management, fund procurement, facilities/equipment, institutional liaisons, and consultation (including review of manuscript before submission). Both authors provided writing and data analysis. Ms Brunton provided data collection. The authors thank Barbara Stoskopf for her efforts related to this project and Dianne Russell for her input at the design stage of this project and for a review of an earlier version of the manuscript.

  • This study was approved by the ethics boards at The University of Western Ontario, McMaster University, and the Thames Valley Children's Centre before data collection.

  • The results of this study were presented orally at the 63rd annual conference of the American Academy of Cerebral Palsy and Developmental Medicine; September 23–26,2009; Scottsdale, Arizona. The same results were presented in a poster format at the Ontario Association of Children's Rehabilitation Services conference; November 8–10, 2009; Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

  • This research was supported through the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (MOP-81107).

  • Received August 23, 2010.
  • Accepted November 22, 2010.
View Full Text

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Log in through your institution

You may be able to gain access using your login credentials for your institution. Contact your library if you do not have a username and password.
If your organization uses OpenAthens, you can log in using your OpenAthens username and password. To check if your institution is supported, please see this list. Contact your library for more details.

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.
PreviousNext
Back to top
View this article with LENS

In this issue

Demo Journal of Physical Therapy: 91 (4)
Demo Journal of Physical Therapy
Vol. 91, Issue 4
1 Apr 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Email Article
Citation Tools
Share
Validity and Reliability of Two Abbreviated Versions of the Gross Motor Function Measure
Laura K. Brunton, Doreen J. Bartlett
Demo Journal of Physical Therapy Apr 2011, 91 (4) 577-588; DOI: 10.demo/ptj.20100279
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
Add to Cart ($36)

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Method
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Appendix 1.
    • Appendix 2.
    • Footnotes
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Comparative Associations of Working Memory and Pain Catastrophizing With Chronic Low Back Pain Intensity
  • Cost-Effectiveness of Physical Therapy Only and of Physical Therapy Added to Usual Care for Various Health Conditions: A Review
  • Problems, Solutions, and Strategies Reported by Users of TENS for Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: A Qualitative Exploration Using Patient Interviews
Show more Research Reports

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Author Information

More Information

Additional journals

Other Services

© 2025 - Demo Physical Therapy Journal

Powered by HighWire
Alerts for this Article
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email this Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about Demo Physical Therapy Journal.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Validity and Reliability of Two Abbreviated Versions of the Gross Motor Function Measure
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Demo Physical Therapy Journal
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Demo Physical Therapy Journal web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Validity and Reliability of Two Abbreviated Versions of the Gross Motor Function Measure
Laura K. Brunton, Doreen J. Bartlett
Demo Journal of Physical Therapy Apr 2011, 91 (4) 577-588; DOI: 10.demo/ptj.20100279

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero